
I hate to give in to the cliche, but here goes: their first album was better.
I first heard of Brooklyn duo High Places in January, when I checked out their debut, self-titled album and their follow-up full-length,
03-07 - 09/07, a compilation of their singles released during the titular time period prior to their debut. Their music was meandering and ramshackle, but therein lied a certain mesmerizing charm. Mary Pearson’s flange-y warble provided the perfect voice for Rob Barber’s rhythmic clatter, which sounded as though a number of tin cans were being fed through AM crackle, and his accompanying synth minimalism, which gave the whole complex mess an alluring, atmospheric quality.
High Places was fantastic because it succeeded by sounding so effortless, and because it lured the listener in again and again until Pearson’s subtly sweet melodies finally stuck. Then, you were trapped.
High Places vs. Mankind finds the band trading in their trash-can aesthetic for straightforward, dreamy pop, which is fine, but nothing astounding. The duo sound subdued, as though some thoughtless human being told Barber that his recordings sounded too cluttered and complex, and Pearson that her voice needed to be sweeter, her melodies more obvious, and the song structures more traditional. The album still stands, because hell, there’s nothing wrong with dreamy, synth-y pop songs, but the whole thing verges on the side of boring, which is unfortunate. Album highlights “The Longest Shadow” and “On a Hill in a Bed on a Road in a House” are worth hearing, but by and large, this is a “background” album that hardly rewards repeated or concentrated listening.
If you’re looking to spend some real time in dreamland, but want to stay awake, you might be best to forgo
Mankind for now and head for
High Places instead.